Researchers at Northwestern University (NU) Kellogg School of Management have established a causal relationship between failure and future success, proving German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s adage that “what does not kill me makes me stronger.”
The researchers utilized the evaluation scores of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) between 1990 and 2005 to separate individuals into two groups: the “near-misses” whose scores were just below the threshold that received funding; and the “just-made-it” whose scores were just above that threshold.
They then considered how many papers each group published, on average, over the next 10 years and how many of those papers turned out to be hits, as determined by the number of citations those papers received.
Analysis revealed that individuals in the near-miss group received less funding, but published just as many papers, and more hit papers, than individuals in the just-made-it group. The researchers found that individuals in the near-miss funding group were 6.1 percent more likely to publish a hit paper over the next 10 years compared to those in the just-made-it group.
“The fact that the near-miss group published more hit papers than the just-made-it group is even more surprising when you consider that the just-made-it group received money to further their work, while the near-miss group did not,” said Benjamin Jones, study co-author and a professor of entrepreneurship at Kellogg.
Researchers wondered whether the effect could be attributed to a “weed-out” phenomenon, that the early-career failure caused some scientists in the near-miss group to exit the field, leaving only the most-determined members. Further analysis revealed that while the attrition rate after failure was 10 percent higher for the near-miss group, this alone could not account for the greater success later in their careers.
After testing a number of other possible explanations for the long-term success of the near-miss group, researchers could not find any supporting evidence for any of their hypotheses, suggesting other unobservable factors, such as grit or lessons learned, might be at play.
“The attrition rate does increase for those who fail early in their careers,” said lead author Yang Wang, a postdoctoral fellow at Kellogg. “But those who stick it out, on average, perform much better in the long term, suggesting that if it doesn’t kill you, it really does make you stronger.”
The research does not contradict the Matthew Effect, but rather suggests a complementary path for those who fail.
“There is value in failure,” said Dashun Wang, an associate professor of management and organizations at Kellogg. “We have just begun expanding this research into a broader domain and are seeing promising signals of similar effects in other fields.”
The study, posted on NU’s website on Tuesday, has been published in Nature Communications.